On 1/22/13 10:04 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
Hi All,
As promised, a VM is ready to go.
Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM
as a whole.
I'm interested in helping to maintain the demo VM so please add me to
the list.
Cheers,
Jure
I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is
done here with my infra
hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may.
Thanks
Gav...
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Martin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
about
a
temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
perception), but
I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
important at
this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
achieve some progress.
I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just the backlog of projects
jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy.
I will start the VM today.
what service urls do you want?
I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls
of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be
worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with
something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with
would probably be:
* current - the latest official release
* nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed
over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of
that
against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such
a
demo.
Cheers,
Gary
