On 04.02.2013 18:24, Olemis Lang wrote: > On 2/4/13, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> > :) > > [...] >> 2. Checking Bloodhound is a suitable name (see >> > [...] >> This appears to be partly backed up by the following thread from our >> after our last report: >> >> http://markmail.org/thread/wvnk4w6z7e25rx2h >> >> note in particular Brane's reply to Jukka's message to see the frank >> evaluation of the circumstances at the time. >> > [...] > > On the subject of bloodhound.com , well ... I checked myself > bloodhound.* domains before (first time one year ago , last one just a > few months later) and they were just about puppets and others only > contained non-sense ads . > > What shall we do about that ? Is it a major issue ?
I personally don't think it is, but we have to list the possible conflicts and eventually the Incubator PMC will make the call about whether we should change the name or not. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
