On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...] > With my user hat on: I disagree. IMO it's better to have different > relation types than to confuse the meaning of "dependency" or "child". > E.g., Jira as "is-related-to" for this purpose, and also differentiates > between "depends-on" and "is-blocked-by". > That sounds reasonable. I incorporated the suggestions as clarifications in the BEP.
