On 2/22/13 4:26 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 2/22/13, Jure Zitnik <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2/22/13 9:47 AM, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
#355: Run Trac test suite against product environments - after #115 #288
[...]
Currently ticket, enum, component, milestone, version, permission and
wiki tables are translated.

I agree that the 'attachment' table should also be added to the list.
+1

The 'system' table will be added as that's required by non-product aware
component upgrade process.
am I missing something or u listed system in excluded tables list below ?


The exclude list does (did) not include the changes, so it reflects state before the changes mentioned.

I also noticed that 'ticket_change' and
'ticket_custom' tables are currently exluded from the translator and
should be added too.

Based on our previous discussion they should not given the fact that
ticket ID is still global . In this case what is missing are the DB
tables implementing product-specific ticket seq numbers

I think that 'ticket_change' and 'ticket_custom' should also be included in the translator, just to keep things consistent and to prevent non multi-product aware components running in product scope from accessing data in other product scopes.

attachment,
should be translated

repository, revision,
node_change,
these are for the VCS . IMO repositories should be global and have
«soft links» to products , thus allowing for reusing them in different
product contexts . We might prefer the notion of per-product forks
instead . So this is open for debate (in a separate thread / ticket
... please ;)

+1

ticket_change, ticket_custom,
if ticket ID will be global then these are global as well , and
additional ticket seq DB tables will be added ... otherwise they
should be translated .

I will add those to the translate list for now as explained above.

report,
should be translated

+1

To summarize, 'attachment', 'ticket_change', 'ticket_custom' and 'report' tables will be added to the translator list.

What we'll do with the 'system' table depends on discussions in other thread (database upgrade etc.).

Cheers,
Jure



Reply via email to