(I have requested the permissions earlier today) ________________________ @jdreimann - Twitter Sent from my phone
On 6 Mar 2013, at 16:26, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Turns out that Joe was lacking the permissions after all so I have sorted it > out now. I believe there is still be time to put in any updates if anyone has > anything else for us to mention. > > Cheers, > Gary > > > On 06/03/13 14:29, Gary Martin wrote: >> Yes, I like it too. I was going to let Joe put it in as I think he has the >> relevant permissions. >> >> Cheers, >> Gary >> >> On 06/03/13 14:15, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> I like Joe's proposal. Why isn't it in the Incubator wiki yet? :) >>> >>> -- Brane >>> >>> On 05.03.2013 20:43, Joachim Dreimann wrote: >>>> I think we should be more direct in what our goals are, so here is my >>>> suggestion for the report: >>>> >>>> We're hoping to graduate soon, potentially before the next report. While >>>> growing our community further continues to be important, we have seen >>>> more outside interest recently. This addresses the only barrier to >>>> graduation raised after the December2012 report. >>>> We have further prepared by completing the PODLINGNAMESEARCH. >>>> >>>> The project now has two online demo instances running of Apache Bloodhound, >>>> one of which shows the current state of the trunk branch [ >>>> http://bh-demo1.apache.org ] and providing a first implementation of the >>>> new search functionality, responsive layout and multi-product architecture >>>> that has been developed. Together these represent the main strands of what >>>> Apache Bloodhound set out to achieve. Unfortunately, we do not yet have the >>>> ability to make use of the repository browser, which was something that was >>>> brought up in the previous report. >>>> >>>> We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also seen >>>> more interest in the project from a number of channels including irc and >>>> the dev mailing list which we are, as ever, hoping to convert into growth >>>> of the developer community and continue to improve upon diversity. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5 March 2013 16:23, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04/03/13 16:06, Gary Martin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4 March 2013 15:58, Branko Čibej <[email protected] <mailto: >>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04.03.2013 16:36, Gary Martin wrote: >>>>>> > OK, I think we get the hint. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If nobody has volunteered to write up the report before I do, I >>>>>> should >>>>>> > be able to get onto it tomorrow. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The main things that spring to mind at the moment is that over the >>>>>> > last 3 months we have completed the namesearch which, aside from >>>>>> our >>>>>> > decision over whether we have achieved enough diversity, pretty >>>>>> much >>>>>> > clears the way for graduation. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > We can also add the creation of demo servers with lots of help from >>>>>> > Gavin to completed infrastructure requests but we are still >>>>>> waiting on >>>>>> > a means to effectively connect our issues.apache.org/bloodhound >>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound<http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound>> >>>>>> to our >>>>>> >>>>>> > area of subversion over NFS, or any other solution. This was >>>>>> raised in >>>>>> > the December2012 report and I am not aware of any significant >>>>>> progress. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Any more upbeat news to report will be good too. >>>>>> >>>>>> We've seen some outside interest in the project, at least on IRC; not >>>>>> much, but it's a start. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we may as well announce that there will be a community vote >>>>>> on >>>>>> graduation readiness soon -- i.e., I think we can start it right now. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, it would be good to get a decision from the community so that sounds >>>>>> like a good plan to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Gary >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I've just thrown this together. I'll add this to the incubator report soon >>>>> to use as a starting point unless anyone thinks that I have not been >>>>> upbeat >>>>> enough again! >>>>> >>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Community growth/diversification >>>>> 2. >>>>> 3. >>>>> >>>>> Since the last report, three months ago, Bloodhound has completed >>>>> its PODLINGNAMESEARCH which aside from issues of >>>>> diversity was the final item to consider prior to graduation. The >>>>> Bloodhound community has been discussing the >>>>> issueof graduation following positive comments following the >>>>> Decemeber2012 report and the community vote has now >>>>> begun. >>>>> >>>>> The project now has demos running of Apache Bloodhound, one of which >>>>> shows the current state of the trunk branch >>>>> andproviding a demonstration of the new search functionality that >>>>> has been developed. Unfortunately, we do not yet >>>>> haveability to make use of the repository browser, which was >>>>> something that was brought up in the previous report. >>>>> >>>>> We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also >>>>> seen more interest in the project from a number >>>>> of channels including irc and the dev mailing list which weare, as >>>>> ever, hoping to convert into growth of the >>>>> developer community and continue to improve upon diversity. >>>>> >>>>> The questions that we are meant to answer (currently listed in our entry >>>>> on the wiki page) are: >>>>> >>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to >>>>> be aware of? >>>>> How has the community developed since the last report? >>>>> How has the project developed since the last report? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Gary >
