On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Matevž Bradač <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 13. Mar, 2013, at 18:02, Ryan Ollos wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.5 > >> (incubating). > >> > >> Please find the change log for this proposed release below: > >> > >> * Implemented Bootstrap templates for the repository browser, log viewer > >> and attachment pages. > >> * Upgraded Bootstrap to version 2.3.1. > >> * Upgraded Trac to version 1.0.1. > >> * Various bug fixes and enhancements. > >> > >> * Not fixed for this release: > >> * No major outstanding issues > >> > >> For this release, the archive differs from the tag in that the Trac > >> "contrib" directory has been removed from the archive. The files > >> in that directory currently lack license headers. We are working > >> with the Trac team to clarify the licenses under which the contrib files > >> are released: > >> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/273 > >> > >> The release candidate artifacts consist of source release as a tar.gz > >> archive along with the associated MD5 and GPG signature. > >> These can be found at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/ > >> > >> The archive is based on the tag: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.5-incubating > >> > >> Please vote: > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.5 > >> [ ] +0 Don't care > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain) > >> > >> The vote is open for 72 hours and, if successful, will be followed by a > >> vote on general@incubator for a further 72 hours. > >> > > > > Matevz, what should we say about the responsive layout for this release? > I > > have not tracked that work closely enough to be able to summarize it > myself. > > I think we can at least mention it. The main implementation was > finished (see #217), and what is left is more or less fine-tuning > and bug fixing. > Another reason for mentioning would be to get the user feedback on > usage with tablets and phones. Beforehand the experience was quite > cumbersome (lots of zooming in/out, panning etc.), with 0.5(.1) this > will have been addressed to a large extent. > I'll add a very general statement then, such as "Added responsive layout support."
