I think, we also mentioned possibility to add/select columns for grid view.
Regards, Andrej On 14 March 2013 17:01, Joachim Dreimann <[email protected]> wrote: > This is my suggestion for the Query Builder UI in Grid view / batch edit > mode: > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/attachment/wiki/BloodhoundSearch/search%20grid%20view.png > > I believe this reflects all the previous comments made on this, but I may > have missed something. Please let me know if I did and I will update it > shortly. > > Cheers, > Joe > > > On 1 March 2013 11:23, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 01/03/13 10:59, Andrej Golcov wrote: >> >>> I'm not clear on what this means in practice - I had the impression that >>>> both Amazon and (current) Bloodhound show the number of items found under >>>> the current constraints (query term, other facets) per facet. >>>> >>> Actually, Amazon search shows counts for Brands out of search scope. >>> For example, using your sample from url above, if you filter by >>> Sumsung brand, you see also other brands and counts. Ok, we are to >>> deep in technical details here. >>> >> >> It is a good point though. The advantage of allowing this is that we get >> the ability to do or relations within each category but, unless there is >> some kind of shortcut to the information in whoosh, it would mean multiple >> searches. >> >> The ebay solution mentioned in Andrej's reply also shows another means to >> create the OR condition by providing a popup to show just one category of >> facets which would be a search that could be done on demand. They also do >> not bother with showing the number of results under each category except >> within the popup. >> >> I think I prefer the form that Joe proposes for giving more information >> but it may be worth compromising. >> >> >> >>> - Number of products can be quite big and facet filter IMHO is not >>>>> the best way to filter product specific resource. I would suggest >>>>> having an combo or dropdown with product selector. Something similar >>>>> to projects in >>>>> http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/**issues<http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues>or >>>>> "computer >>>>> components" dropdown in amazon link that you provided. The product >>>>> selector can be part of top navigation and used not only by search. >>>>> >>>>> Seems reasonable, although I would suggest that Chosen has a better >>>> Multi >>>> Select style: >>>> http://harvesthq.github.com/**chosen/<http://harvesthq.github.com/chosen/> >>>> >>> +1. >>> >> >> Looks good to me too. >> >> >> >>> - search breadcrumbs: >>>>> - What does link on "Search >" on the left of breadcrumb? >>>>> >>>>> http://[bloodhound]/search (incl current search box query) >>>> >>> Ack >>> >>> - I suppose that click on "Ticket >" link in the breadcrumbs resets >>>>> all filters except search box query? Does "Clear filters" link >>>>> duplicates the similar functionality? >>>>> >>>>> My thinking was actually that it removes all filters other than the >>>> one for >>>> Type. >>>> >>> I like how ebay represents search breadcrumbs, for example, check this >>> http://goo.gl/jHZPQ >>> It is very clear that click on search breadcrumb deletes a particular >>> filter. >>> >> >> This was closer to what I was thinking we would want but it could be >> duplicating the ability to delete a filter from the side menu. The current >> design is suggestive of a positional breadcrumb which may not be so >> appropriate here (though currently consistent with other uses). >> >> >> >>> - I think about "View as" as a part of toolbar below of search >>>>> breadcrumb. The toolbar may include select all/none methods, batch >>>>> operations etc. >>>>> >>>>> Yep. Those options shouldn't be visible though unless they actually >>>> apply. >>>> See Gmail's batch operations buttons for inspiration. >>>> >>> +1 >>> >>> - Will we support possibility to specify sorting in free text search >>>>> view? >>>>> >>>> No - If our sorting of results isn't good enough for the majority of >>>> cases >>>> we should probably fix that before we ask users to figure it out for >>>> themselves. >>>> >>> Ok. >>> Just one note: grid view already supports sorting of columns similar >>> how it is done in Trac custom queries. >>> I think we can later provide kind of sort selector, at least for grid >>> view. >>> >> >> Sounds good. >> >> Cheers, >> Gary >> > > > > -- > Joe Dreimann > UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> > * > * > *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN > HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *
