On 3/19/13, Joachim Dreimann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 March 2013 16:42, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: [...] >> >> That is fair comment.. it might not be great for everyone. One aspect of >> that is that if we make it switchable we are likely to have the new >> comment >> at the latest comment end. I think that is what Joe intends with the >> buttons above the comment input in the mockup. >> > > Yes in the mockup there's a switch above the comment box to switch to > oldest first, which would reverse the arrow direction and place the comment > box at the bottom.
sorry u r right . my mistake . I didn't notice . > On 'oldest first' maybe also a link to jump to the > comment box? > + [...] >> >> As for the threaded view, perhaps we can add that later if there is >> enough >> demand. >> > > I'd agree. I think the threaded view don't fit Bloodhound's purpose very > well, Jeff Atwood wrote a good argument along those lines: > http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/12/web-discussions-flat-by-design.html > interesting . /me reading > If there's enough demand we can add it back in anyway. > > I would argue that the "Comments only" option isn't as needed with the new > design and that we should add it back in (or do something smarter to reduce > the noise) when there's enough demand. > Ok. Overall I like it . -- Regards, Olemis.
