On 22.03.2013 16:59, Olemis Lang wrote: > On 3/22/13, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > [...] >> So basically you have replied to my commit that *did not* introduce the >> problem, stated that there was a problem and that the line in question >> should be reverted "to what it was before" > yes . I meant «without the bold styling in WikiFormatting» ... > >> and told me to fix it > very wrong . I never said Ryan . I never said «search is all wrong» . > I said «this is breaking WikiFormatting»
You replied to a mail that had nothing to do with the reported bug. A conversation on a mailing list is significantly different than face to face, and correct context is a lot more important. In this case, you should either have found the actual commit that caused it and replied to that, or simply reported the bug without referring to any particular commit; it would have caused less confusion all around. In any case, the bug is now fixed and the worst thing that can happen is starting a flame war about what was actually said and how it should be interpreted. That goes for everyone involved. Let's just move on and, in future, remember to re-read mails and think about how they can be interpreted before sending them. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
