On 25.03.2013 15:19, Joachim Dreimann wrote: > Yes, I believe both are related. I don't believe they are good GSoC > submissions though because they seem too small in scope even when taken > together, and plugins already exist for both.
In that case I suggest someone besides Olemis and me goes through the GSoC candidates and cleans up, because I really don't have enough BH-fu to do that. -- Brane > On 25 March 2013 13:57, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Whilst filing projects for GSoC, I came across these two issues: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/185 >> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/233 >> >> Am I correct in assuming that they're basically related, could share a >> lot of infrastructure and could therefore be combined into a single >> project for GSoC? >> >> (N.B.: The absolute deadline for GSoC submissions is Wednesday. I'd >> really appreciate a bit of help here.) >> >> -- Brane >> >> -- >> Branko Čibej >> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com >> >> > -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
