Baiju M a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Baiju M <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Baiju M <[email protected]> wrote: >>> My plan is to create a place holder package for our BlueBream, similar to >>> http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/ and http://svn.zope.org/groktoolkit/ >>> This package will be part of our infrastructure to test all our >>> dependencies together. >>> We will include community packages (z3c.* and other packages) as an >>> additional set. >>> So, there will be a core, officially supported set. And a community >>> supported set. >>> All the package which was part of Zope 3.4 will be included in core. >>> Actually, Zope 3.4 KGS mix community packages, but we will split it. >>> Well, I need more time to think about all these. So, there will be some >>> variations while we are going to do it. >> Well, I created the "place holder" location for compatibility tests here: >> >> http://svn.zope.org/bbkit/ >> >> We will tag this for each release, also we will make branches for >> maintenance. >> >> We will link to ztk.cfg & zopeapp.cfg in zopetoolkit. In addition to >> that we may have few extra packages. We will pull whole zopeapp, if >> required. >> >> Also we can add our community packages an an extra list. > > I just started documenting it here: > > http://wiki.zope.org/bluebream/BlueBreamKit
Are you sure you want to duplicate the ZTK ? If every project has its own kit, what's the purpose of the ZTK? Should'nt bluebream just be based on the ZTK 1.0? I suppose we can just possibly add some packages specific to bb on top of the ZTK Christophe > > Regards, > Baiju M > _______________________________________________ > bluebream mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/bluebream > > _______________________________________________ bluebream mailing list [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/bluebream
