Le 07/07/2010 17:19, Baiju M a écrit : > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Christophe Combelles<[email protected]> wrote: >> Le 07/07/2010 08:30, Baiju M a écrit : >>> Hi All, >>> I was thinking about cutting the first release candidate for 1.0 >>> release >>> by next week. Any suggestions/objections ? >> >> I was wondering, is it worth waiting for the ZTK release? We could maybe just >> depend on the ZTK, which is at the alpha1 stage, but there is not a lot to do >> for a final release. We should just modify bbkit to depend on zopetoolkit. > > I am fine with this. Please let us know if we can do anything to push > ZTK 1.0 release. > >> I was also wondering whether we really need the bbkit or not. It causes some >> additional maintenance work, and have similar version numbers. Is there a >> way we >> can merge bbkit and bluebream into a single package? > > You mean bbkit& ztk ?
I mean bluebream and bbkit. I'm not comfortable with having 2 versions numbers, with two releases, one for bluebream, one for bbkit. Is there a way to include the version list directly in the bluebream package, and maybe to avoid replicating the ztk infrastructure? > > Regards, > Baiju M > > _______________________________________________ bluebream mailing list [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/bluebream
