Christophe -

This all sounds very sensible.

To ease review, could you link to specific revision / diff views?

I got them myself with a bit of resourcefulness, but it'd be handy to
have a prose explanation for the list of what you did.

Just a suggestion.

In general, it sounds like you've found a sensible path.

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Christophe Combelles <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've first worked in a branch to let bbkit depend on the ZTK
> http://svn.zope.org/bbkit/branches/ccomb/
>
> After that change, I realized we actually don't need bbkit anymore...
> So I've merged it into the bluebream package:
> http://svn.zope.org/bluebream/branches/ccomb-remove-bbkit/
>
> It works and it is simpler for everything, because there is only one package 
> to
> maintain and release. and the version list is very small now. Then we can
> consider adding other community packages such as z3c.form and others.
>
> I've also added a way to choose the version of BlueBream when creating a
> project. That means, if a new version of BlueBream is released with changes 
> only
> in the versions.cfg, we can create a new project with these new versions,
> without upgrading the bluebream package. It's still compatible with previous
> versions, and works the same way.
>
> I've added a note on how to release bluebream now, which is not very 
> different:
> - just tag the bluebream package, and upload its versions.cfg.
>
> If there is no objection I'll merge the changes into the trunk, and retire 
> bbkit!
>
> We will be able to release BlueBream 1.0 at the same time as the ZTK 1.0!
>
> Christophe
> _______________________________________________
> bluebream mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/bluebream
>
_______________________________________________
bluebream mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/bluebream

Reply via email to