On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Christopher Lozinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for all the great feedback. > > The current release of BlueBream has the TTW tools disabled or hidden. > Some of us really like doing things TTW, but there is not a clear > roadmap of which packages to use. Here is the current list of > recommendations I have received. As I work through each of the tools, I > will edit it with my experience. Of course if you post your > experiences, that would be most appreciated. > > http://specialtyjobmarkets.com/Wikis/LozinskiClasses/ZTKTTW > > I find it interesting the flack I have received for wanting to do things > TTW. A Zope 2 client I was talking to yesterday was very interested in > the TTW tools. I now understand that it is really a choice people > should be making, whether to use TTW tools or not. Each person can make > those decisions intelligently based on their circumstance. In fact I > think that one of the barriers to acceptance of BlueBream in the larger > market is the disappearance of the easy-to-use TTW tools. > > So by creating an advocacy page for TTW BlueBream development, I hope to > bring balance to the force, and encourage the community to provide > better support for TTW development tools, and indeed to integrate them > into the mainstream BlueBream release.
While working on TTW tools for development, please remember what Paul Carduner and Roger Ineichen said here: https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-users/2008-June/007927.html This applies to Ice Control and Rotterdam skins. We can improve the TTW tools which helps administration tasks. But this need not be a complete TTW development platform. Are you looking for web based IDE like Web2py: http://web2py.com/book/default/chapter/03 or a TTW development platform like Zope 2 ? Regards, Baiju M _______________________________________________ bluebream mailing list [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/bluebream
