Here's my final result. I'm satisfied; I'm pretty sure there is no way to
reproduce the results of the OPTIMOL results exactly. In the cases below
I'm convinced there are bugs in OPTIMOL -- mostly in not consistently
recognizing  5-membered rings, but also there is something odd going on in
the empirical bond parameter calculation.

Bob

# version=12.3.26_dev
#
# code: adding empirical rules to MMFF94 calculation
#
# checkmm.spt;checkAllEnergies
#
# checking calculated energies for 761 models
# 1 COMKAQ     E=   -7.3250003   Eref=  -7.6177    diff=  0.2926998
# 2 DUVHUX10   E=   64.759995    Eref=  64.082855  diff=  0.6771393
# 3 FORJIF     E=   35.978       Eref=  35.833878  diff=  0.14412308
# 4 JADLIJ     E=   25.104       Eref=  24.7038    diff=  0.4001999
# 5 PHOSLA10   E=   111.232994   Eref=  112.07078  diff=  0.8377838
# 6 PHOSLB10   E=   -93.479004   Eref=  -92.64081  diff=  0.8381958
#
# for 761 models, 6 have energy differences outside the range -0.1 to 0.1
# with a standard deviation of 0.05309403
#
# a comment about empirical bond parameter calculation:
#
#    // Well, guess what? As far as I can tell, in Eqn 18 on page 625,
#    // the reduction term and delta are zero.
#
#    // -- at least in the program run that is at the validation site:
#    //  OPTIMOL: Molecular and Macromolecular Optimization Package
17-Nov-98 16:01:23
#    // SGI double-precision version ... Updated 5/6/98
#    //
#    // This calculation is run only for the following three structures. In
each case the
#    // reported validation values and values from Jmol 12.3.26_dev are
shown. Clearly
#    // the r0 calculated and final energies are very good. subtracting off
0.008 from
#    // r0 would certainly not give the reported values. Something is odd
there.
#    //
#    //             bond      red*     r0(here/valid)  kb(here/valid)
Etotal(here/valid)
#    //
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#    // OHWM1       H1-O1     0.03      0.978/0.978       7.510/7.51
-21.727/-21.72690
#    // ERULE_03    Si1-P1    0.0       2.223/2.224       1.614/1.609
-2.983/ -2.93518
#    // ERULE_06    N1-F1     0.0       1.381/1.379       5.372/5.438
1.582/  1.58172
#    //
#    // *reduction and delta terms not used in Jmol's calculation
#
#

-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave.
Northfield, MN 55057
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
phone: 507-786-3107


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss

Reply via email to