On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Egon Willighagen <
egon.willigha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with all the Open storms around now, which is good,
Yes
> it's important
> that the Blue Obelisk stays on the radar. It's doing important things
> and if not well-known it will be easily overlooked.
Agreed. Maybe we can produce a catalogue of software and other resources.
And we should look for funding.
> And there remains
> so much to be done in chemistry...
>
> (BTW, anyone among us going to the upcoming Dutch Open Science
> Conference in April? Sadly (for me), I have been put on the waiting
> list...)
>
>
Not me - there may be people going from Open Knowledge.
> So, would like to start using the @blueobeliskx account for tweeting
> releases of Blue Obelisk software, RT meetings, and the sort. This
> account used to be used by the Blue Obelisk eXchange, but because the
> Shapado people are missing in action, and my login no longer works,
> that (as Rich predicted) is a lost platform at this moment...
>
>
> Is everyone OK with that?
Yes
> Please let me know if you like access to the
> account too, so that others can help with the tweeting and RT-ing.
>
> Egon
>
--
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval
_______________________________________________
Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list
Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
