Hi Michael,
It was helpful to know the insight of the container.
Thank you.
I support your view.
Thanks,
2020-05-21 06:07 に Michael Stauber さんは書きました:
Hi Tomohiro Hosaka,
https://www.blueonyx.it/easy-migrate
Yes, I have already tried. Great tool!
Very well. Thank you!
I created a similar perl script at $work many years ago to move vsites
between bluequartz.
When I glanced at the source code, I felt a deja vu.
Net::OpenSSH is a very good library.
I use it for many other purposes.
Yeah, it's really nice and for projects like this where you have to
repeatedly make SSH/SCP/RSYNC calls it's a big time savior. I did have
to make a few calls outside of Net::OpenSSH, though, as I was running
into some limitations. But overall it's a great library.
I'll try to have that ready for you within the next 1-2 days. I
wanted
to do an updated 5209R ISO anyway as the last one is from March this
year.
Oh my god! I'm so happy I could cry!
I'm glad to hear that. Here is the URL to the updated 5209R ISO:
https://devel.blueonyx.it/pub/BlueOnyx/ISO/BlueOnyx-5209R-CentOS-7.8-20200520.iso
When you use it you'll see a new boot option that allows you to use
"HD-Autodetect EXT4" and it'll then install with EXT4 instead of
XFS-partitions.
Furthermore, if `reboot` becomes `systemctl restart`, would it be
possible to make a dockerfile in the future...
I thought about that and I'm not sure if it's a route I want to pursue.
Sure, changing /sbin/reboot to "systemctl restart" is no big deal and I
could easily do that.
No, I mean pursuing Docker. It appears like a dying breed and the
recent
change in ownership might drive the final nail into that coffin. There
is also Podman (RedHat's fork of Docker), there are Snaps (which I hate
with a passion!) and other competing containerized approaches.
At the end of the day it's much fewer hassles to get BlueOnyx to run in
a somewhat more "real" container such as under OpenVZ (which we fully
support since day one of BlueOnyx) or under LXC/LXD.
I tried the 5210R over half a year ago.
The installation was fine, but I encountered a few issues and
decided to adopt the 5209R.
I remember that one of them was that I couldn't login with ssh.
I think it's resolved now.
Yeah, 5210R had a bit of a rough start and the many design changes in
CentOS 8 (not all to the better) didn't help either. But these issues
have been mostly ironed out and there are only 2-3 more small issues on
my to-do list for 5210R. None of them being critical.
But continuing to use 5209R is fine, as it still has lots of life left
in it.
_______________________________________________
Blueonyx mailing list
Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it
http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
