The RAQ3 listened (s) to ports 80, 81, 444 so yes, it goes back that far. -- Larry Smith lesm...@ecsis.net
On Thu September 10 2020 15:42, Ken Hohhof wrote: > I'm trying to remember, does 444 go all the way back to Sun Cobalt? > > Hey, if I could get in a time machine and go back and change things in > history, there's lots of things I would change. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Blueonyx <blueonyx-boun...@mail.blueonyx.it> On Behalf Of Ralf Quint > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:24 PM > To: blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it > Subject: [BlueOnyx:24265] Re: 5209R logins > > On 9/10/2020 1:10 PM, Chris Gebhardt - VIRTBIZ Internet wrote: > > Hi Ralph > > > > > Considering that TCP/443 is the default port for https and TCP/80 is > > > > the default port for http, this doesn't make much sense! > > > > > Why did you chose opposite "+1" ports for this???? =-O:-( > > > > These ports are for the BlueOnyx GUI. Not for websites. You can't > > very well have the control panel GUI on the same ports as regular > > Apache (or whatever your webserver of choice). That's standard > > across all hosting systems I've come into contact with. > > Well, you did not pay attention, which starts already with my name... > > I am fully aware that those are the ports for access the GUI and not for > web sites (I am using the Internet before it was referred to as Internet). > > What I was referring to is why the "+1" port for access to the GUI are > swapped between https and http according to Michael's post. More logically > TCP/81 should be the http port and TCP/444 the https port for accessing the > GUI just as TCP/80 is the http port and TCP/443 the default https port for > web sites. > > Ralf _______________________________________________ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx