At point of cross-browser capabilities: it's perfect out of the box. I did one project (CMS was Wordpress), where i got YAML drafts and it was hell to bring dynamic content into this! Never ever again. (Maybe for static 1990-stuff). Just give me a nice clean html-page with divs and bp-classes, but please never come again with some sh***y YAML-crap. You get one stylesheet with some hundred rows, an extra-stylesheet for IE (bp doesn't need one) and html including some js. As i said: Never ever again.
And don't give too much at smashing mag. They do nice stuff. But far from perfect. I wouldn't call them a reference. If you are looking for references: Ask at "A List apart". Part of their stuff is worth beeing called "reference". -K. > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:01:06 +1000 > Von: Alexander Stepanets <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [BP #3884] To Blueprint or not to Blueprint? > > 09.03.2010 17:53, noozillander wrote: > > we cannot recommend you to work with Blueprint. It's cross-browser > functionalities are very limited. > > Hmmm... > Looks like they haven't seen BP at all.. :) > Nothing against them, but... it's my 1'st impression after reading... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Blueprint CSS" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en. > -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Blueprint CSS" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
