+1 for the plugin On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Peraza <[email protected]>wrote:
> Oh sorry, I didn't read that carefully!. > > I understand your point, but still a similar technique may be shipped > through a plug in that states its limitations clearly, so blueprint's core > code would not be compromised, unless someone really wants to use that plug > in being already aware of what it implies. > > Still we would need to find the right work arounds. But I think I can > collaborate by googling a bit more on this. > > "Sean K. Stewart" <[email protected]> escribió: > > >Daniel, > > > >Have you been to the positioniseverything.com article lately? The > >first thing I notice on the page is this: > >"Several problems have been found with this technique since > >publication. Those problems are discussed in Appendix J [http:// > > > www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/appendix/equalheightproblems > ]" > > > >Still a very cool technique. Thanks for sharing. Not sure it would be > >good to add to a stable CSS framework such as Blueprint. > > > >-- > >Sean K. Stewart > > > > > >On Nov 2, 11:07 am, Daniel Peraza <[email protected]> wrote: > >> El 02/11/10 10:24, Sean K. Stewart escribi : > >> > >> > Hey Daniel, > >> > >> > Smooth trick!! I like it a lot, but it seems limited. Not only limited > >> > in height (where did you come up with the number 32767?), but also > >> > cross browser? Which I think would hinder the inclusion into > >> > Blueprint. > >> > >> 32767 is the biggest signed integer a computer can store with 16 bits. > >> It doesn't have to be this way, it is just meant to be a representation > >> of an unbounded or infinitum length. > >> > >> > Do you have any more resources for using this technique? I want to > >> > learn more about how you came to this solution. Thanks > >> > >> This is just a technique I've been using a lot since the first time I > >> read this article: > >> > >> http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/equalheight > >> > >> So far, I haven't had any cross-browser problems. > >> > >> > On Nov 2, 10:25 am, Daniel Peraza<[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi guys!. What do you think if we include the following rules into > the > >> >> blueprint code: > >> > >> >> .equal-height > >> >> { > >> >> overflow:hidden; > >> > >> >> } > >> > >> >> .equal-height> div { > >> >> padding-bottom:32767px; > >> >> margin-bottom:-32767px; > >> > >> >> } > >> > >> >> Thus, if we have the following code: > >> > >> >> <div class="container equal-height"> > >> >> <div class="column span-4"> > >> >> <p>This is the sidebar</p> > >> >> </div> > >> >> <div class="column span-16"> > >> >> <p>Here goes the main content</p> > >> >> </div> > >> >> <div class="column span-4 last"> > >> >> <p>This is the right column</p> > >> >> </div> > >> >> </div> > >> > >> >> We may achieve equal height multicolumn layouts. What do you think? > > > >-- > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Blueprint CSS" group. > >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<blueprintcss%[email protected]> > . > >For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Blueprint CSS" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<blueprintcss%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en. > > -- Stuardo -StR- Rodríguez <[email protected]> https://parejaslibres.wordpress.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Blueprint CSS" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en.
