While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues :
- The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least
very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF
release. Is this OK ?
- The BluSky website is based on the Tuscany design and styles, and
during the page content copy, some tuscany specific code were also
copied. See patch below with necessary changes. [3]
- Why we have urchin.js [1], a Google Copyrighted js used by Google
analytics checked in to Apache SVN ? Is this OK legal wise ? If the
file is really needed, I'd recommend pointing to the online version as
below ? See patch below with suggested change [3].
<SCRIPT src="http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js";
type="text/javascript"></SCRIPT>
Noticed that I have created a patch [3] that address the last two issues.
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/files/html/Bluesky%20Downloads%20&%20Documentations%20%20Apache%20Bluesky.htm
[2]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bluesky/webpage/files/images/urchin.js
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lresende/bluesky/bluesky-website.patch
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
