"we" means the bluesky team at XJTU.usually, we have a meeting every Monday to arrange the work of teammates.Also We discuss the problems and the questions post on the mailist.
2008/9/7 Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] to improve awareness that there > is something fundamentally going wrong, IMHO] > > On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 13:03, Samul Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The license header missing mistake is totally my fault,i had't have my > done > > well.Sorry guys-_-!.Bill had suggestted us to post all the report on the > > mail list. > > > But we had't achieved an agreement in time to put all the reports > > on the mail list. > > Where was that discussed? I do not see a public discussion of this on > the Bluesky mailing list. > Who is "we"? > And by the way, there is no need reach an agreement here. Posting > reports and everything else publicly is the _precondition_ to make > this an open source project. > > > Tomorrow we'l have a weekly meeting, i wish that we could > > solve these problems after discussions. And i will propose the team > leader to > > publish content of every meeting we will hold. > > Hold your meeting on the mailing list, or on a public IRC channel. > Everything else is not acceptable. > We do not have team leaders here at Apache. But we have clear rules > how projects operate. > There are plenty of resources (texts) and examples (projects) here at > the Incubator and on the other projects how that is supposed to work. > Decisions are made in a consent-driven manner, not by team leaders > off-list. > Everyone has an equal say. No individual is entitled to make a final > decision unilaterally. > > Bernd > > > 2008/9/6 Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> Hi Bluesky project, > >> > >> Again, I have concerns regarding your svn commits. The recently > >> commited HTML and CSS code misses a license header. > >> Please improve the code as soon as possible, to avoid a veto. > >> > >> Also, I don't remember that the report topics/todo lists contained in > >> that HTML have been discussed as a whole or in more depth on the > >> public list. This concerns me. > >> > >> I'd like to propose that bluesky changes to Review-Then-Commit, > >> instead of Commit-Then-Review because of apparent lack of > >> eyeballs/mentor oversight. > >> > >> Bernd > >> > > >
