Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Hey guys, > > Thanks for discussing this on the list. You're on the right track. > It may seem pointless to some extend, because nobody else than you is > participating in the discussion. But be assured that this all is read > by many subscribers and those who will read this later from the > archives. > > Bernd >
Bernd, Exactly right. I am following this discussion. Thanks, Bill > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:30, Jin Cao <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Kevin! >> >> 2009/3/13 Samul Kevin <[email protected]> >> >> >>> audio part： >>> http://vorbis.com/ >>> http://xiph.org/vorbis/ >>> video part： >>> use theora >>> http://www.theora.org/doc/libtheora-1.0/ >>> http://www.theora.org/ >>> >>> 2009/3/13 chen hecky <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>>> -_-! Sorry. I have no idea about the libvorbis now. But after studying >>>> >>> some >>> >>>> libvorbis or working with the Apache's help and advice, we maybe find a >>>> lib to replace the FFmpeg, i think! >>>> >>>> 2009/3/13 Shan Jiang <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Chen Chen,would you tell me what API libvorbis provide to us, after you >>>>> stury the libvorbis API? If you give us some example program that >>>>> >>> invoke >>> >>>>> libvorbis API, we can understand it easily. Thanks:) >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, HAIPENG DU <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> If they are different, we can have a look at "adapter mode". Hope >>>>>> >>> this >>> >>>>>> might not cause too many changes to our codes. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2009/3/12 Samul Kevin <[email protected]> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> maybe we could consider replacing libavcodec of FFmpeg with >>>>>>> >>>> libvorbis. >>>> >>>>>> After >>>>>> >>>>>>> i finish the pouching hole programming and the thesis work, i will >>>>>>> >>>> read >>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>> documents of both library. God bless us they have the same >>>>>>> >>>> interfaces. >>>> >>>>>>> 2009/3/12 du.haipeng <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have removed ffmpeg from our project because of license >>>>>>>> >>>> conflict. >>>> >>>>>>>> The simple version has no audio or video function,which is the >>>>>>>> >>>> core >>>> >>>>> of >>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Some solution has been proposed in the maillist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think it is time to deal with it and make a plan, is it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> du.haipeng >>>>>>>> 2009-03-12 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 杜海鹏 [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> 西安交通大学计算机科学技术系陕西省天地网技术重点实验室 >>>>>> >>>>>> 电话：+86-13772014365 >>>>>> >>>>>> QQ:176225285 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Shan Jiang a.k.a dane @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hecky @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Bowen Ma a.k.a Samul Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jin,Cao a.k.a caojin8...@gmailcom >> >> > >
