That is correct. Though the feature could be implemented I believe that there are likely other technologies that could accomplish this better than blur.
Thanks, Aaron On Friday, May 8, 2015, Tom Hood <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see any blur mutation support for something like a compareAndSet > operation. So if we have several threads/processes concurrently > incrementing/decrementing an integer count in a blur record, I'm assuming > we would have to use something outside of blur to synchronize access. > > Is that correct? > > Thanks, > -- Tom >
