On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 12:13 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > This is how GNOME works; thus far the 'release team' has not gone bad, > and plenty of people have come and gone through the team. > > > Good suggestions, though I'd like a fixed number of ESC members too. > > On the contrary; I would like it flexible; so if RedFlag > joins, or IBM > joins, we can immediately offer them permanant representation (eg.) > rather than having to pick who to kick off ;-) or waiting for another > election cycle. > > Meritocracy is great, but a quiet, relational process works > rather well > too IMHO, and having a small group of people who can actually decide > things and work together effectively is really useful.
Hi, May I ask here then, the term 'release team' is used above and this is a question that has been on my mind for a few days. I suppose this is a question specifically for Michael, but not exclusively so. The ESC, do you see this as a very active group, for instance working as the release team, meeting often and looking at individual issues? Thanks much, Drew -- E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
