Hi Charles, hi all! Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 16:42 +0100 schrieb Charles-H. Schulz: > - changes requested by Christoph: I added one sentence about the > english version being the official one. As for usability, please go > ahead :-) make sure people understand there's one page dedicated to > the logos though.
Okay, I had a look (or two) on the pages ... TRADEMARK POLICY Fortunately, there seems to be sufficient protection, since I was unable to edit the Trademark Policy wiki page. Thus, I've edited the content on my user page that should be (if the changes are perceived as improvements) copied to the real page. Charles, could you take care of that, please? http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:ChristophNoack/Temporary_Work_Space#The_Document_Foundation_Trademark_Policy Changes: * Overall: Added some headings to improve the structure of the text and to ensure proper TOC creation by the wiki (although some changes might appear awkward) * Section "Related Information": Added this section (referring to Logo Policy, Branding Guidelines) and linked from within the text to this section. * Section "The Trademarks": Added list of the trademarks to ease the understandability --> By the way, the information is duplicated in "Purpose"; is that helpful? * Overall: Converted the text-only mail address into a "clickable" mail address * Overall: Changed "hard" formatting to a style that better fits to the wiki LOGO POLICY I've overhauled the logo policy, although the naming of some items seems still to be strange (I'd like to have some shorter names like: TDF Logo, Community Logo - or something like that). http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Logo_Policy Major Changes: * Moved the content to a table * Changed the point-of-view from "we" to "TDF", and "they/external" to "other" --> Rationale: Most of the people will be part of the community, so it would be strange to tell them being "external". The "we" for TDF seemed a bit too self-centered ... although it is correct from our point-of-view :-) * Added "Usage Examples" --> Are these descriptions okay, are more important ones missing? I think these examples have great value in describing when to use, when to avoid the TDF subline logo. * Overall: Improved description of legal mailing list (now: "non-public") * Overall: Changed "hard" formatting to a style that better fits to the wiki Since there have been major changes, could you please thoroughly check whether the text still fits to your thoughts and our goals? Thanks a lot! Cheers, Christoph -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
