On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 15:32 +0300, sophie wrote: <snip>
> I already gave my opinion on this topic to > Daniel and Daniel, so they know that I'm all for their action. > I'm the one battling the most I think for the language groups to be the > only official representation in the project, Hi Sophie, others Alright - this is the part I find difficult to reconcile "only official representation". Naturally there are certain functions here, such as translations where the language based association of individuals should make a team and that team should have responsibility for that function. However, once you step past translation work I do see the clear line that says this group has official responsibilities with other functions performed. Could you expand on that for me, what you mean by 'only official representation' - it would help me understand. > but I completely understand > the needs for local marketing and support. So of course, I support the > creation of the material you're designing and also really appreciate > your work on this. > As I tell you, there is already various associations existing in > different countries that support local actions, more or less officially > representing LibreOffice. I would like that we have a more clear and > defined affiliation and support between these associations and the TDF, > but I didn't get the time to think enough about it yet. > In any way, if you want to set such associations in Venezuela or > Argentina, I don't see any issue. If I follow what you are saying - if you create a legal entity of some kind, outside of TDF, and then want to work with us that is OK - that is a fairly high bar to set, IMO. Thanks Drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
