Hi Drew, all Just short:
I fully agree that the question of defining the LibreOffice teams and dedicated parts of the community is important. Only after this definition the question about dedicated logos should be posed. Even if I'll probably not be able contribute much to the thread, I welcome your interest in this discussion. In my first mail to this thread I already included some proposals how to look at the different teams and groups. Just leave the logo parts out of the quote: I wrote:
A) ... officially supported LibreOffice teams (defined by dedicated TDF resources like http://<team>.libreoffice.org website or <team>@libreoffice.org mailing list) ... B) ... LibreOffice conference ... similar to A), even if the conference team might not be given a website or mailing lists with the names mentioned in A). C) ... regional marketing teams ... are officially approved by TDF and provided with <team>@marketing.libreoffice.org mailing lists ... D) Individual community members (approved by the Membership Committee) ... not allowed ... to behave like an official LibreOffice or TDF spokesperson or representative. E) Local teams based on individual community members or supporters not being approved as community members by the MC ...
> > Perhaps you can use some of my ideas here.. drew schrieb:
... so speaking for myself I would make time this coming week to actively engage in a discussion and work on putting a draft together on the wiki with what comes out of such a discussion.
Thank you very much for this offer, unfortunately my time is much more restricted than I thought some time ago...
Best regards Bernhard -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
