Hi :) I think just the vote count is fine. If people want more info they can look through the appropriate thread. I do quite like the idea of a list of names as a way of people checking they were counted correctly but there are times when a vote needs to be taken anonymously. So, on balance i'm quite happy without names. Regards from Tom :)
>________________________________ > From: Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> >To: board-discuss@documentfoundation.org >Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2013, 8:38 >Subject: Re: [board-discuss] Format of the BoD votes announcement > >Hi Norbert, > >Norbert Thiebaud wrote on 2012-12-21 14:40: >> I'd like to suggest that the summary of the BoD vote as exemplified >> below be slightly changed to included nominative informations relative >> the the vote. > >[..] > >> Result of vote: >> 3 approvals: John, Robert, Caroline >> 0 neutral >> 1 disapprovals. Phillip > >it makes sense to me, and from my side, we can start by doing so with the very >first minutes in 2013. It also helps in counting votes properly, if we need to >explicitly state the names of the voters. > >Maybe we can even add the opinions of those who are participating, but not >formally allowed to vote (e.g. the audience or deputies not representing >anyone). It helps giving an impression of the overall opinion. > >Any thoughts from someone else? > >Florian > >-- Florian Effenberger, Chairman of the Board (Vorstandsvorsitzender) >Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 >Jabber: flo...@jabber.org | SIP: flo...@iptel.org >The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany >Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts >Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint > > > >
