Just having a bit of fun :-) I'm OK with any terminology you want to use to measure the level of nerdiness of the users.
Paolo On 26/05/2020 17:02, Heiko Tietze wrote: > Always good to have bike-shedding questions in such a list ;-). First, we > have to agree on such a survey including what exactly we want to learn and > which questions we have to ask. The proficiency self-estimation is just a way > to split answers into more or less experienced people. So back to > Stallman/Thorvalds/Musk/Trump, the better option is maybe "I'm a professional > system administrator" (whatever we put there, it's clear that this is the > maximum option). > > On 26.05.20 16:52, Paolo Vecchi wrote: >> On 26/05/2020 16:09, Brett Cornwall wrote: >>> On May 26, 2020 6:10:44 AM PDT, Paolo Vecchi >>> <paolo.vec...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: >>>> 4 I think lately Richard Stallman has been involved in controversial >>>> stuff. Maybe it's safer to use Linus Torvalds to avoid comments? >>> Further, Stallman is actually not very technically proficient these days >>> and makes for a poor example of a 'God-tier' hacker. >> :D True. >> >> So shall we settle for Linus Torvalds or there are other suggestions? >> >> Paolo >> -- Paolo Vecchi - Deputy Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
