I'm agreeing with Dieter that description of the current situation
versus desired situation is lacking. What the needs and desires are.
Also there is mention of of a few constant objections and issues coming
up around a third party option, without mentioning those objections and
issues.
Luxembourg would be pretty good choice geographically, linguistically
(spoken). However numerous sites are French only; and those sites point
in circles. So the (internet) accessibility is rather hard. Germany/
Netherlands are doing a somewhat better job in that area, based on quick
assessment of some sites: Like chamber of commerce; tax authorities;
courts.
Quote:"It seems a good compromise which could fix a lot of issues, bring
additional benefits and still allow the TDF to operate with the same
level of freedom as a business but at the same time clearing the doubts
about due oversight and brand awareness"
I love clear, explicit communication. What are the comprises made (how,
to which extend). Which issues are fixed. Additional benefits, which
ones. Kind of opportunity's/ threats/ strengths/weaknesses of the
different domiciles
Anyhow, if we are moving to Luxembourg, is there leave the zits of TDF
in Germany. Or should it be considered to move TDF to Luxembourg to. Not
knowing anything about the history of TDF and reasoning behind it at the
time to opt for Germany.
For the record: TDF Services SIS Proposal pretty OK; for comparison
matters, make a list of few other country's. To have options and a way
to compare. Quite a number of the listed SIS benefits don't seem to be
unique. Probably also found in other country's (like Germany or
Netherlands). Maybe not always in the same context. For the Netherlands
you might end up with an association:
https://business.gov.nl/starting-your-business/choosing-a-business-structure/association/.
It's possible to run a business within the association; so only taxed
for the commercial part. And there actual members (being requirement),
instead of they MC committee being build into the statutes of the
Stiftung. There can be difference in voting rights and so on. I assume
this being possible in Germany too.
Regards,
Telesto
Op 26-8-2020 om 13:51 schreef dgp-m...@gmx.de:
Hello Florian,
perhaps I've forgotten something during that long going discussion,
but I miss some basic informations:
1. Why it isn't possible for TDF to fulfill the activities, the TDF
subsidiary should fulfill? In German law there's the possibility for a
foundation to have a "Wirtschaftlichen Geschäftsbetrieb" or - as a
better solution - a "Zweckbetreib".
2. What are the necessary conditions a TDF subsidiary has to fulfill?
Without those criterias it would be difficult to make a helpful
proposal. Paola has some requirements in his proposal. Is this
consensus in the board? Which criteria are necessary, and which
criteria are additional ones?
Perhaps it is possible to add some basic informations to the folder.
Kind regards
Dieter
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Collecting proposals on TDF subsidiary
Datum: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 02:30:31 -0700 (MST)
Von: Florian Effenberger [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]
<ml+s969070n4286132...@n3.nabble.com>
An: dieterp <dgp-m...@gmx.de>
Hello,
as discussed during the last board calls, the board is currently
collecting proposals on a TDF subsidiary. For that, we've created a
folder "TDF Subsidiary" in the Nextcloud "TDF Members" share, where the
various ideas will be collected.
The folder is also publicly available at
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/NeBWm25cd2LHyoq
Please do consider all content as a draft, work-in-progress state that
is subject to discussion and changes. Note that the documents do not
represent any official board opinion, statement or vote, but are drafted
by individual members or groups.
The first proposal added so far is the one by Paolo Vecchi on a
Luxemburg entity.
The board is eager to get the discussion started, preferably on the
public board-discuss mailing list.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger, Executive Director (Geschäftsführer)
Tel: +49 30 5557992-50 | Mail: [hidden email]
</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4286132&i=0>
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [hidden email]
</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4286132&i=1>
Problems?
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion below:
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Collecting-proposals-on-TDF-subsidiary-tp4286132.html
To unsubscribe from Board Discuss, click here
<http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1783306&code=ZGdwLW1haWxAZ214LmRlfDE3ODMzMDZ8NTc1NTM0Mzkw>.
NAML
<http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
