True, Bugzilla is not a perfect tool for discussion. All I'd like to say is that there was a lot of input during summer and I miss some resume or feedback about all the input.
TBH it looks like a mascot 2.0 disaster. Cheers Am Mi., 23. Sept. 2020 um 13:06 Uhr schrieb < emiliano.vavass...@documentfoundation.org>: > Hi Andreas, > > As much as I support and share the need of a public discussion/process on > this (and the subgroup should have worked on integrating suggestions > received, see Italo's recent email), I should also add that Bugzilla is the > least correct tool to put this through. > > This is not a technical issue, but more a direction and strategy one and > not only technical (coding) people should be involved. > > As such, I would remark yet again to please stick with board-discuss as a > public way to discuss the MarCom Plan bits and pieces. > > Thanks for your inputs and for your your contributions to the project > > Cheers, > > Il 23 set 2020 11:54, "kainz.a" <kain...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > Am Mi., 23. Sept. 2020 um 11:50 Uhr schrieb kainz.a <kain...@gmail.com>: > > > a) LibreOffice 7.0/7.1 marketing plan > URL: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/3206 > Status: Paolo, Franklin, Michael, Thorsten, Mike, Italo continue > working on this, Follow-on meeting was done, information/what is > uncontroversial and could be decided to be done now > > > I didn't see any process in the past weeks/months on this topic. > There is a bug report, mailing list and a redmine issue, > no process or discussion was done in the last weeks. > > Please start to focus all feedback from summer > and start the discussion on BZ or any public place again > to find a solution with the support of as many people as possible. > > > On each tiny change on LibreOffice we fill bug reports > and wait for feedback and approval and for this big topic > I miss a global decision. In redmine only a final pdf was linked. > That's not how LibO development works. > Consolidate the decision in BZ, where all other decisions were discussed. > > again cheers > Andreas_K > > >
