Who participated in the vote please? Detached from the minutes its not
obvious.

Thanks

Simon



On Tue, 23 Nov 2021, 06:50 Emiliano Vavassori, <
emiliano.vavass...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the following decision, which was taken in private on 2021-10-15, is now
> made public in accordance with our statutes.
>
> The Board of Directors at the time of voting consists of 7 seat holders
> (not including deputies). In order to be quorate, the vote needs to have
> 1/2 or more of the Board of Directors members, which gives 4.
>
> A total of 5 Board of Directors members have participated in the vote.
>
> The vote is quorate.
>
> A quorum could be reached with a simple majority of 3 votes.
>
> > I hereby call for the following combined VOTE (i.e. a single agreement
> counts towards the approval of both points; the two points cannot be voted
> individually, nor it is possible to agree on one point and disagree on the
> other one):
> >
> > * approve the proposed amendment to the Rules of Procedure [1], that
> includes the Conflict of Interest Policy [2], both as published in my email
> from 4th October 2021 on board-discuss@documentfoundation.org, to become
> effective immediately after publication;
> >
> > and
> >
> > * publish the amended Rules of Procedure to the members and the general
> public on 1st November, 2021
> >
> > As usual, the vote will run for the next 72 hours, starting from the
> moment this mail vote is sent.
> >
> > [1]:
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2021/msg00219.html
>
> > [2]:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:BoD_Conflict_of_Interest_Policy_ver1_1.pdf
>
> Result of vote: 4 approvals, 0 abstains, 1 disapproval.
> One deputy supports the motion.
> Decision: The proposal has been accepted.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Emiliano Vavassori, Member of the Board of Directors
> The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
> Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
> Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
>
>

Reply via email to