hi Florian,
On 03.02.22 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hello everyone,
the below mail is a bit older - Christmas break and some other tenders
came in between, so I get to this only now.
Florian Effenberger wrote on 01.12.21 at 15:30:
(2)
The search result from item "Required 2." contains Meta-issues.
Expanding them results in 80 issues.
Using Whiteboard as search criteria has no advantage compared to the
Meta-issues. And I think both, Whitheboard search or Meta-issues, are
not suitable for a tender, but a tender needs to list the issues
explicitly.
The list from Whiteboard search and Meta-issues needs to be examined
and prioritized manually.
This is taken from the specification at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2021#Cleanup_.26_further_improve_ODF_conformance
I fear answering that question is beyond my skills. ;-) Does it make
sense to bounce this question back to the ESC for further specification?
Regina (thanks a lot!) sent a list of bugs back in December on the dev
mailing list:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2021-December/088210.html
Was there any further discussion or feedback on this? If the list
mentioned there is fine, I replace item 2 from the tender with it. If
we're unsure whether that meets the budget or not, as the person days
are listed in the tender, we can add a note along the lines of "Please
propose a subset and prioritization of these bugs, that do not exceed
the person days factored in for this tender, see below."
thanks for reminding me, due to too much vacation i forgot but now i
just provided some feedback about some of the issues to Regina.
i haven't thought about how much time the selected issues would require
yet, it's possible it might still be more than the budget which the BoD
wants to spend, so i guess a fixed budget and then apply for a subset of
the issues makes sense.
Michael Stahl wrote on 03.11.21 at 10:49:
the scope of this is quite large and unclear... *required* items are:
1. ODFAutoTests: addressing issues will be difficult because as
Regina points out the web service appears to be offline.
IIRC it's possible to run the tests offline, but currently i guess
nobody knows how much work it is to set that up and what problems
would actually be found, so i guess this item mostly amounts to "get
ODFAutoTests to run at all".
I've tried to rephrase #1 a bit, let me know if this is better.
Is the current wording fine?
i guess, as long as nobody interprets it to mean "set up a public
website" :)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
