I guess I was proposing that until a voting app can be built, that the community could continue using email as a voting app.
--David On Mar 12, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > That's true, but those votes wouldn't qualify under the IPR policy > and procedures for any of the significant decisions, such as > starting a working group, approving drafts, etc. They're also not > good enough for electing board members. > > What are you proposing that these votes would be good enough for? > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Recordon > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Topic for this week's agenda > > The community can always just have a lightweight version of voting. > Someone makes a proposal, others +1 it, boom done. > > On Mar 10, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Martin Atkins wrote: > >> Drummond Reed wrote: >>> Scott and Bill: >>> >>> Per the thread below, the question of when we will be opening up >>> new Working >>> Groups for specifications is starting to come up. I'm not saying >>> there is a >>> compelling reason to do that yet for any spec other than PAPE (and >>> the >>> Trusted Exchange spec that Nat Sakimura and his team have >>> suggested), but I >>> do think that OIDF needs to take a public stance about: >>> >>> a) The status of current WGs (to my knowledge it's not published >>> anywhere >>> what WGs exist or are planned) >>> >>> b) The process for community members to form a WG. >>> >>> Can we put a short discussion about this on this week's agenda? >>> >> >> It was my understanding that the blocker for this is that we have no >> voting system through which we can hold a vote for the creation of a >> WG. >> >> Obviously that is in hand per our discussions at the last meeting. >> However, I guess we could discuss an interim plan to get the first >> few >> WGs up and running quickly. It'd be nice if these could be up and >> running by IIW so that the WGs can potentially present to the >> community >> what they've been up to. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> board mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
