Tony made the point today that for certain votes, some board members may need/want to obtain advice from legal counsel, which requires a bit of time
It was my point earlier that some issues require some thinking by the members before they should vote, and also the ability to have one-on- one conversations to inform one's vote -- among board members but also outside. Come to think of it, board members should have the time on substantive issues to ask a question on a mailing list, and listen to what members say, before deciding how to vote. It's the equivalent of doing an opinion poll in one's district before voting in Congress ;-) to make sure the constituents are adequately heard.
Would one week be sufficient for these kinds of purposes? Cheers, Johannes. Johannes Ernst NetMesh Inc.
<<inline: openid-relying-party-anonymous.gif>>
<<inline: lid.gif>>
http://netmesh.info/jernst
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
