I love the idea of having "complete by" dates! Great!!
Now we have two committees with a published time line, deliverables and assigned responsibilities. Anybody think this is a trend that the other committees also might want to follow? ;-)
On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:30 , Scott Kveton wrote:
Hi Everyone, I'm working with the hiring committee (Johanness, David and Raj) to help identify candidates for the Executive Director position. Here is the plan of attack that we have developed (big thanks to Johannes for fleshing most of this out): 1. Hiring committee will conduct the initial review of applicants and interviews. 2. This committee produces a short list to the board, say up to 3 ranked candidates, and our impressions. 3. The committee will organize an open review call for other board members with each of the candidates. 4. The board votes on those 2 or 3 candidates. 5. One dedicated individual negotiates with the prospective ED (I'm nominating Dick for this). 6. If we can't agree on those candidates, we'll move to hiring a recruiter, modify the process accordingly and repeat. Timeline is as follows with "complete by" dates: 1. Scott & David screens resumes - 9/12/20082. The committee subsets into "talk to" and "do not talk to" - 9/18/20083. Each of us does phone screens of 2 or 3 candidates each, report back, and we prioritize - 9/25/2008 4. Each remaining candidate is being interviewed, if at all possible in person, by at least 2 of us, preferably all of us. - 10/2/20085. Committee meets to discuss who should be on the short list - 10/3/20086. Present short list to the board on the 10/9/2008 all-hands call FYI, - Scott _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
Johannes Ernst NetMesh Inc.
<<inline: openid-relying-party-anonymous.gif>>
<<inline: lid.gif>>
http://netmesh.info/jernst
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
