Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > I take it you didn't have to personally "figure out the IPR afterwards"... >
That's actually my point. There are lots of folks for whom the IPR stuff isn't a concern for one reason or another. Those folks shouldn't be prevented from getting on with stuff while those who *do* care about IPR are figuring it out. That's exactly what happened with OpenID 2.0. Lots of folks had it implemented long before the IPR was done. If I author a spec then I'm quite happy to sign an IPR non-assert where necessary, but the current process is far heavier than that and isn't really helping anyone because folks are just writing and implementing specs outside of the IPR framework because the IPR framework stops them actually getting any work done. _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
