Lots of plus's -- see inline. On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Chris Messina <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'm generally of the mind that we leave it is as for now and not waste more > time debating this. I don't think it's worth $2000 of the foundation's money > to work on this and I think we have more important things to deal with. > +1. > > I think if we started with open sourcing the OIDF voting tool, that would > at least provide a means to inspect the current sign in system so that any > enterprising member with time or money on their hands could contribute a > fix, but for the meantime, I think the majority of the membership is served. > +10 > > I also don't think that a membership vote is what's needed here; instead we > need leadership and the ability to decide what are absolute priorities that > will lead to the widest benefits. > +1 > > While there's cause to provide support to members having trouble signing in > to the site, I don't think we need to make major modifications to our > current approach if it is generally accessible and workable for 90%+ of the > membership. > > Perhaps Janrain could provide us with stats on current failure rates with > RPX so that we could better evaluate the wisdom of making additional > investment in alternative logn solutions? > +1. > > Chris > >
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
