Indeed -- we should have all documents in a consistent place, where board members can access these documents and maintain them.
What other documents might we be missing? Chris On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:34 PM, David Recordon <[email protected]> wrote: > If your doc isn't there then I never got it from Bill. > > On Feb 3, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Nat wrote: > >> Comments inline: >> >> =...@tokyo via iPhone >> >> On 2009/02/04, at 3:16, David Recordon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We've been keeping executed IPR docs at >>> http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/ as PDFs >> >> Apparently not because my IPR doc does not appear there. There is a chance >> that some other party's doc is not recorded there as well. >> >> >>> and I think we could do the same sort of thing for other Foundation >>> documents. >> >> +1 >> >> Let us assign a permanent URI to each official document now on. >> >>> >>> >>> --David (moved to the public list) >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> >>>> Date: February 3, 2009 12:42:56 AM PST >>>> >>>> Right. >>>> >>>> Ideally, we assign a permanent URI to each document, and that URI >>>> returns >>>> 303 redirect to the physical location of the document etc. would be good >>>> so that we can keep the URI the same without regard to the physical >>>> underling >>>> storage software. >>>> >>>> Also, at the start of the new board working, it would be a good practice >>>> to >>>> see if we have all the legal documents in place, e.g., membershp >>>> agreements, >>>> IPR agreements, etc. Last time I checked the executed IPR agreement >>>> directory, >>>> I did not see NRI's, though I know we have executed and handed in person >>>> to Bill at IIW2008a. >>>> >>>> =nat >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chris Messina <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Scott Kveton <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Great. >>>>>>> How are we maintaining these documents? >>>>>>> Do we have like... an archive somewhere? Should they be public or >>>>>>> private? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know if we have a way of doing this today. >>>>>> >>>>>> There's no reason these can't be public after we announce; wiki? >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I'm mostly thinking for archival and group purposes. I know >>>>> lately Nat >>>>> has been asking for a lot of documents that seem to me believe in a >>>>> readily >>>>> available place... since the wiki allows for File Upload -- might as >>>>> well >>>>> put them there for now. Seems easier and more generally accessible than >>>>> anything else. >>>>> Chris >>>>> -- >>>>> Chris Messina >>>>> Citizen-Participant & >>>>> Open Web Advocate-at-Large >>>>> >>>>> factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org >>>>> citizenagency.com # vidoop.com >>>>> This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> board-private mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Nat Sakimura (=nat) >>>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> board-private mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> board mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > -- Chris Messina Citizen-Participant & Open Web Advocate-at-Large factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org citizenagency.com # vidoop.com This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
