Who is in charge of this to make it happen? If someone doesn't own it, it probably won't happen, even if it should. I'm not volunteering either, just asking.
Chris On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> wrote: > Fellow board members, legal council, and legal community: > > I just looked at http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/ and > http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/executed/ > > For people to join new Working Group, these seem to be out of date. > > We should remove > > > http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Entities)_20071205.pdf > > http://openid.net/ipr/Non-Assertion-Agreement/OpenID_IP_Contribution_Agreement_(Individuals)_20071205.pdf > > and put the new ones > > > http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.doc > > http://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/paper-contribution-agr-final-clean-20080107.pdf > > instead. > > Also, we must make sure that the relevant parties submit new Contribution > Agreement when they start working on a new working group. > > In addition, it might be possible that we have to do the same for PAPE 1.0 > retrospectively. (I hope not.) > > I seek legal people's advice on this. > > Best, > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > -- Chris Messina Open Web Advocate Personal site: http://factoryjoe.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina Diso Project: http://diso-project.org OpenID Foundation: http://openid.net This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
