> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:42:26 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] 6.6.20 and work scheduling
> To: "Josef W. Segur" <[email protected]>
> Cc: BOINC dev <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <of69f1dbee.c26efdf0-on882575a5.006bb27c-852575a5.006c4...@sybase.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> We need to run the check for what should be run on a variety of events and
> at least once every task switch interval.
>
> We need to do schedule enforcement on a different set of events, one of
>which is going to occur very frequently - checkpoint.
>
> jm7
Which begs the question if we DIDN'T do it at every checkpoint (or time) but
rather based upon TSI would things improve? I don't know the answer and i'm
sure nobody else does either, but plenty of people have their
opinion.
Given the differences of opinion regarding this, perhaps we could have a test
version that does the checking based upon events rather than events + time. The
only way we are going to know for sure if it improves things is to try it and
see what it does. My suggestion is we have a test build that is based only on
events and the ability to turn off checkpointing as being one of those events.
We can test it and provide some facts.
MarkJ
Enjoy a safer web experience. Upgrade to the new Internet Explorer 8
optimised for Yahoo!7. Get it now.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
