On Apr 30, 2009, at 9:15 AM, [email protected] wrote: > I have read the code in great detail. The first loop is an attempt to > initialize a variable to a known state. The state is changed later as > needed.
And this is the point you keep missing. If the next state you change to is Preempt, Then, you have preempted all tasks. You cannot start with all tasks preempted, change some of them back and then assert that TSI is respected. If TSI is respected, you would only change the state of those tasks at TSI to preempt. This is not what the code does. If TSI was respected I would not see tasks started and halted in seconds. _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
