Yes, that's what I saw - thanks for the confirmation! J On 17 Sep 2009, at 19:41, David Anderson wrote:
> When running _autosetup on FC11, I get the following. > If anyone knows how to get rid of them, let me know. > -- David > > > configure.ac:308: warning: > AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works, ...): suspicious cache-id, > must contain _cv_ to be cached > m4/libtool.m4:568: AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION is expanded from... > m4/libtool.m4:4559: AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC is expanded from... > configure.ac:308: warning: > AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_CXX, ...): suspicious cache- > id, must contain _cv_ to be cached > m4/libtool.m4:2604: _LT_AC_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... > m4/libtool.m4:2603: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... > m4/libtool.m4:1646: _LT_AC_TAGCONFIG is expanded from... > configure.ac:308: warning: > AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_F77, ...): suspicious cache- > id, must contain _cv_ to be cached > m4/libtool.m4:3673: _LT_AC_LANG_F77_CONFIG is expanded from... > m4/libtool.m4:3672: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_F77_CONFIG is expanded from... > configure.ac:308: warning: > AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_GCJ, ...): suspicious cache- > id, must contain _cv_ to be cached > m4/libtool.m4:3773: _LT_AC_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG is expanded from... > m4/libtool.m4:3772: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG is expanded from... > > James Wanless wrote: >> I don't know if it's related. [It could well just be my so-far >> inability to set up a correct Fedora10 machine for running the >> server on... I'm still experimenting... :)] >> But, I experienced some (actually several) odd-looking warning >> messages when running the _autosetup stage on F10. They definitely >> weren't there for the same code under F8, and AFAIK, the code all >> seemed to compile and even run fine subsequently (F10 as well) >> despite these. I'm afraid I didn't log them, but they were all of >> the order "Suspicious xyz in abc" (IIRC). If it's of concern (or >> not easily explained by my ineptitude - any help very gratefully >> rec'd - thx), I can probably reproduce them here in exact detail if >> nec. This seemed to be for all/many recent changesets, including, I >> believe, even the server_stable of several months ago (I was >> curious, so checked! :). As I say they were doubly surprising (to >> me at least) both because the warnings were under the _later_ >> version of Fedora, and the use of the word 'Suspicious' several >> times, which I don't think I for one, have seen before. >> Anyway seemed I ought to flag it in response to this message >> (below), just-in-case... >> J >> On 17 Sep 2009, at 19:10, David Anderson wrote: >>> I checked in changes that add options to all server programs: >>> --help prints the usage >>> --version prints the name of the repository and the version# >>> from which the program was built. >>> This will require a _autosetup/configure/make at the top level. >>> >>> BTW, I've noticed a couple of problems in the build system: >>> >>> - "make" at the top level rebuilds everything in sched/, >>> even if it's up to date. >>> >>> - dependencies across directories are ignored in some cases. >>> For example, if you make everything, >>> then go to tools/ and touch backend_lib.cpp, >>> make doesn't rebuild anything. >>> >>> If any autoconf/automake experts can figure this out, let me know. >>> >>> -- David >>> _______________________________________________ >>> boinc_dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >>> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >>> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
