>>> h) establish cross-project credit parity >> Yes, but consider overhead. > > I did, and I still think it is negligible for the potential benefit gain. > Again, the problem is you can pick any one aspect decide that this one > aspect does not meet your approval and reject the whole idea ... or, > because you do not consider all the aspects as I did decide that the cost > is not worth it ... because you claim that one component of the plan does > not deserve the potential investment of compute time.
Actually already answered but will repeat, I personally really hope that all aspects were analysed, not just single one. It would be incorrect indeed to reject any whole idea of many parts just because one part not as good as others and could be replaced. Before h) were a), b), c), d), e), f), g) ;) _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
