Thanks, we're aware of the potential issues here :-) Now does anyone have an answer to the technical question? I suppose this also applies to anyone using the AdaptiveReplication scheme (which we're not)
thanks, Adam On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:02 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless you have a quick method of getting back from the answer to the > original question (i.e. one direction is hard and the other is extremely), > do yourself a favor and use 2 tasks for validation. Some projects have a > means of validating the result against the original answer and others do > not. It really depends on the problem space your project is in. > > jm7 > > > > Adam Bazinet > <pknut...@umiacs. > umd.edu> To > Sent by: [email protected] > <boinc_dev-bounce cc > [email protected] > u> Subject > [boinc_dev] single result > validation > 10/30/2009 01:59 > PM > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > In the BOINC validator framework, what is the recommended way to validate > just one result? The compare results function takes two results, of > course, > so I probably don't want to use that (right?) > > Is there some example code in the documentation or distribution somewhere? > Or would any projects doing single-result validation be willing to share a > template of their code with me? > > Currently we are using a default string comparison validator and the > two_credit function - we're starting with two results/WU, but would like to > cut that down to one for a particular application. > > thanks, > Adam > _______________________________________________ > boinc_dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev > To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and > (near bottom of page) enter your email address. > > > > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
