OK, I can agree with that. I would still like to add the exception for
idle CPU though. That would make it:
if a project has wacky DCF, ask it for work
only if the number of devices used by runnable jobs
is less than (resource share)*ninstances, OR a CPU is idle and it is
otherwise the best candidate.
jm7
David Anderson
<[email protected]
ey.edu> To
[email protected]
01/15/2010 12:24 cc
PM [email protected]
Subject
Re: Work fetch tweak.
I think that's too extreme;
if project A has a wacky DCF and several other projects don't,
project A will never have more than 1 job running,
which may violate resource share.
The following policy might be better:
if a project has wacky DCF, ask it for work
only if the number of devices used by runnable jobs
is less than (resource share)*ninstances
-- David
[email protected] wrote:
> ===================================================================
...
> Could we change this to be:
>
> Only fetch work in this case if that project has no other tasks on the
> system, or there is an IDLE CPU?
>
> jm7
>
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
