When the minority is < 1% is it worth the time and effort (both
constrained), and is it worth the probability of breaking the usefulness
for the 99%?
jm7
Raistmer
<[email protected]
> To
Sent by: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[email protected]>,
<boinc_dev-bounce <[email protected]>
[email protected] cc
u>
Subject
Re: [boinc_dev] 6.10.32 failing to
02/12/2010 12:36 maintain sufficient work
PM
Well, "democracy" not always the best thing.
Even if majority use set-and-forget, MINORITY still doesn't. I heard in USA
is now stylish to care about minorities in some pretty weird areas, maybe
it's worth to add BOINC to this too? :P
app_info.xml is used by minority, not majority, too, btw....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] 6.10.32 failing to maintain sufficient work
> If "operator knowledge" is required, then BOINC is not "set and forget."
>
> ... and if the majority of BOINC users are "set and forget" that has to
> drive the feature set.
>
> On 2/12/2010 7:36 AM, Raistmer wrote:
>
>> Actually I don't think it's really complex. All needed is operator
>> knowledge
>> what app performs better paired with what another app.
>>
>> This knowledge can be aquired from simple experiments.
> _______________________________________________
> boinc_dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
> (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
>
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.
