On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:46:31PM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I changed the debian patch based on your suggestions and committed > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2b58a04fa4290ef57ea8b06cfc3c353182ad1f26
The fscanf(f, ".") returns 0 on success (since it matches nothing), so that is still wrong, I guess? Complicated! The '1 == fr' doesn't make much sense to me .. I guess it would be best as '4096 != fr' (if I understand the items correctly)? > is everything ok now? > (write should return -1 in case of failure AFAICS) I guess if you want to be *perfect* then you could check whether write wrote exactly the right amount (so, 1, in the bit at the end of the patch)? But it's already over-the-top to check all this maybe. :) - Alyssa _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
