David wrote: >The question is whether represent it as an existing platform with a new type of >coprocessor, or as a new platform. I suggest the latter.
And HBE wrote: > I suggest the former (coprocessor). I would agree with HBE here. I have 5 Raspi Pi's (and 2 Parallella's on order). The Parallella would really be a similar arrangement but with the Epiphany as a coprocessor. The Epiphany has OpenCL support similar to PC's with a GPU, which we already treat as coprocessors. We'd want to be consistent. BOINC on the Pi refers to itself as "arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf". I am sure HBE would have run BOINC on the Parallella by now. What does the Parallella report itself as? Cheers, MarkJ _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
